تنها راه برون رفت از مخمصه کنونی, سپردن کیان سلطنت به والاحضرت شاهدخت شهناز پهلوی میباشد. پرهیزهوشیارانه از قرائت مردسالارانه و دین محور قانون اساسی مشروطه, اولین قدم اساسی در تنویر افکار عمومی و تعمیم شناخت واقعی از این متجدد ترین سند سیاسی ایران میباشد. 

Omid Dana is not a Saltanat Talab but a Tarafdare Padeshahi 

Before defending RP learn the difference between a monarchist and supporters of Shahrvand Reza Pahlavi who have absolutely nothing to do with the loyatly monarchists have towards the Last Shah's political and historical legacy.

It's RP's disgraceful behavior and betrayal of his pledge to restore the 1906 Constitution (which let me remind you was his Dad's Last will ) which is at the source of all the anger and frustrations against the Man who was once known as Reza Shah Dovom.

The Shah and Reza Shah must be turning in their graves right now 

Shah of Iran's Last Will Read by the Empress Farah

So get your Facts Straight before Attacking Omid Dana ! 

RP today has more in common with Trita Parsi and his revisionist historian buddy Touraj

Daryaee than with Supporters of the Monarchy ! 

"ما نژاد پرست هستیم نه نژاد ستیز"

- امید دانا

ببینید که کار اینا به چه گندی کشیده شده که این مردک شارلاتان با تمام افتخار اعلام میکنه که یک نژاد پرسته.....

خزعبلاتی عوامانه و شاید اتفاقی نباشد که در دوران اوج گیری شارلاتانیسم ترامپ و چرخش براست ارتجاعی طرف میدان را مهیا دیده که نوع وطنی انرا بقول خودش کشف کند بیخبر از انکه این حرفها را شاه اللهی ها و چپ های شرمگین سی سال است که پای منقل قرقره میکنند

شهروند یکبار به وضوح گفت «اگر می‌خواهید رژیم را سرنگون کنید، باید این کار را بدون من بکنید».

این چیزیست که دارد اتفاق می‌افتد. گلایه از برای چیست؟!

"آیا هدف تنها تخریب رضا پهلوی است یا جایگزینی برای او در نظر دارند"  

شهروند خودش را سالهاست که خراب کرده دیگه لازم نیست کسی خرابش کنه!

داریوش؛

میدانم ایرانی با فرهنگی هستی و بدون شیله پیله، مهربانی بکن و با ساده ترین واژه ها فرق بین سلطنت طلب و طرفدار پادشاهی را به من بگو، واقعاً نمیدانم. 

بعد از آن، اگر مایل بودی، دیگر پرسشها دارم که در بالا برخی را صادقانه مطرح کرده ام و میتوانم امیدوار باشم از تو پاسخ قانع کننده بگیرم را میپرسم. 

پ.ن. البته benross هم مخاطب این کامنت هست. 

حیف از وقت آدمی که بیاد به این اراجیف گوش کنه.....

من بعد از مدت‌ها گرفتاری و سفر‌های پیاپی اومده بودم اینجا ببینم چه خبره

واقعا افسوس،،،،

yeki be in baba begeh ke kalmeh sahih "mostamsak" hast na mostamak

Fred Jan 

don't take me wrong I respect you but as a monarchist the monarchy comes first.

The difference between so called Pahlavist and Monarchist is simple 

to understand it one has to look back at history.

Pahlavism and Monarchism were synonymous until RP self proclaimed himself not just a Citizen but already back in the 1990's danced to the tune of President Khatami and called for a Referendum on the future regime in a Post IRI iran.

As heir he had no right to  cross the rubicon and start acting against his father's will even as a so called activist

That was not his mandate 

as a Royal Prince his duty goes beyond  "saving Iran" ( needless to say he is doing a poor job even if he intended to which clearly he doesn't) 

his duty is first and foremost to be the custodian of the Royal institution, the 1906 Constitution which he pledged on the Holy Koran to defend and restore ( His dad did not abdicate to call for a referendum as RP has ... monarchy is not negotiable ... it can only respect the people's will within the limits of the constitution which we monarchist consider as the only legitimate draft for IRan regardless  of the changes which have occured ). RP also has a duty to  secure the future of his dynasty which he hasn't 

He has no heir ... were he to die of natural death or other he has no successor

And that is just one of the numerous institutional duties he has disregarded.

Needless to say all the crap he has said since he entered the political arena which would be too long to develop here but who those who know me and have followed my writings to date know perfectly what I mean.

Pahlavism has lost it's original meaning only to be redefined by RP's personal narrative which is at odds 180 degrees with anything genuine monarchists and Reza Shah and Mohammad Reza Shah Stood for ! 

داریوش،

با سپاس برای صرف وقت و پاسخ دادن. شوربختانه هنوز متوجه نشدم که تفاوت "سلطنت طلب و طرفدار پادشاهی" مورد نظر شما چیست. 

در پاسخ شما صحبت از سلطنت طلب و پهلوی طلب است و دلایلی که رضا پهلوی مور غضب قرار گرفته.

چون رضا پهلوی به زعم شما خطاهایی نابخشودنی مرتکب شده که برشمردید، و  در  "طرفداری پادشاهی" لابد پادشاهی در نظر است که مورد طرفداری قرار گرفته، آن پادشاه کیست؟

To make it simple Fred Jan 

Saltanat talab suggests that the supporter of the monarchy is something of a bot parast 

it comes from Sultan and additionally it's an arab word

 a tarafdare Padeshahi believes that the institution of the

monarchy is more important that the monarch or dynasty that embodies it

Dynasties can come and go 

but the monarchy has survived 25 centuries in our nation because it has been the only genuinely nationalist institution in our country which has preserved the unity and territorial integrity of the nation.

Lastly saltanat talab has become the favorite word used by opponents of the monarchy who claim that Shah and Sheikh is the same thing. 

which is absurd 

if this explanation is not clear I don't know what is.

We support the monarchy and expect the heir to play that role and not go around pretending to be some "democrat" or "candidate" for another system of government as the current incumbant heir has shamelessly be doing. 

داریوش؛

در اینکه سلطنت از منظر تاریخی و فرهنگی با ایرانزمین و  مذاق ایرانی خوانایی دارد با هم همفکر هستیم. همینکه پس از انقلاب بد عاقبت سلطان عمامه دار ایران ویران کُن جای پادشاه تاجدار  ایرانساز را گرفت شاهد این مدعاست.

در اینکه نهاد سلطنت ورای شخص پادشاه است هم با هم همفکر هستیم.

 در اینکه پادشاهی دست و پا بسته با قانون مشروطه و تنها بعنوان نماد همبستگی ایران و  ایرانی راهکار است هم گمان میکنم هم فکر هستیم.  

منتها،  به مصداق اول باید چاه را کند و بعد منار جنبان را دزدید، جایگزین رضا پهلوی کیست؟

البته آنچه مخالفین منجمله چپولان در بارۀ واژه سلطنت میگویند بخودشان مربوط است و نباید اجازه داد که آنها استفاده از الفاظ را تعیین کنند. 

As to the second part of your question :

چون رضا پهلوی به زعم شما خطاهایی نابخشودنی مرتکب شده که برشمردید، و  در  "طرفداری پادشاهی" لابد پادشاهی در نظر است که مورد طرفداری قرار گرفته، آن پادشاه کیست

There is none 

But in any monarchy including in the most advanced and constitutional

Monarchies if the heir commits Lese Majesty

He is dismissed by a Royal Council and another heir can be named

in otherwords RP can be impeached for treason

given that the institution of the monarchy has been toppled by an illegitimate system of government currently ruling the country that is not possible.

The Royal Family can and has the duty to name a male successor within the same family.

Or the Prince who in reality is King by Oath should abdicate and has the royal prerogative to choose his successor withing his own family

The 1906 Constitution explicitly explains this

all you need to do is read it.

If RP refuses to name a successor and goes about in the future to claim his daughter for instance is his successor which is impossible given the legitimate 1906 constitution which his father has transmitted to him as custodian Then the Pahlavi Dynasty is de Facto committing suicide and by Salic Laws prevailing in every monarchist system in the world that Dynasty seizes to exist.

 That gives any pretender of the previous Qajar Dynasty

the Right to claim the throne in their own right and in accordance to the notion of Royal continuity which Shahrvand Reza Pahlavi has betrayed.

and which would make his peers turn in their graves.

If the Qajars don't then

The Vacant Throne is free to be taken by any meritant patriot able to rally the nation like Reza Shah did.

Including from within the ranks of the IRI very much like 

Napoleon who rose from the ranks of the French Revolutionary Army

to build an empire and dynasty of his own

I am surprised that for an Iranian I have to explain to you the laws and rules of the Monarchy and the logic behind it given that you should be familiar with a concept that was invented by us Iranians and adopted by Monarchies everywhere else.

It is funny how fellow Iranians including on this website seem to know or claim to understand concepts like "democracy" and know what a Republic is but need an  

explanation on the fundamentals of monarchy ! 

منتها،  به مصداق اول باید چاه را کند و بعد منار جنبان را دزدید، جایگزین رضا پهلوی کیست؟

  Aknoon een dallalhayeh hogoog bashar va globalistha

 ...

Masih Alinejad Interview With Reza Pahlavi 4 Jan 2012

PS: I know we agree on the fundamentals 

but the political scene today is disingenous and the opposition itself corrupted 

RP himself has become Nourizadeh's stooge and puppet of the Saudis 

So his credibility has totally fallen amongst the genuine monarchist opposition which is tormented like no other.

Believe me observing RP's disingenous and treachery is not only painful for someone like me to watch but I also blame him entirely for what is going on today in our political and ideological family.

RP knew PERFECTLY the consequences of his reckless behavior and clumsy speeches andinterviews and continues to follow the same treacherous path

He has proven time and again that behind this disguise of hogoog bashar and democracy what he wants is escape accountability and responsibility of supporting the monarchy which is his first most duty even before saving Iran which he cannot do singlhandedly

His response to the demos in Iran shouting Javid Shah are a disgrace to his father and grandfather and reducing these brave men and women to "fascists" is a DISGRACE ! 

It's a bitter but sad fact  which we genuine monarchist now have to live with !

Now Agha Zadeh is feeding on Touraj Daryaee and other NIAC Revisionists to develope his treacherous narrative and insult all those who have been fighting for years to defend the monarchy and the legacy of the last shah.

SHAME ON HIM ! 

Gol Gofti DK. People are risking their life's by gathering there, yelling Nationalistic

Phrases, raising lion and sun flag, and even wishing him happy birthday

You would think the idiot will acknowledge their sacrifice and give a 10 minute kick ass

Nationalistic speech in return, but instead he is accusing them of being fascist and

goes back to the same old tired rubbish about Hoghoh bashar and  making sure feelings

of Iran's neighbors does not hurt!  HE IS A MAJOR DISAPPOINTMENT IF NOT EMBRASSEMENT

همه این فحاشی‌ها به رضا پهلوی و اینهمه بحث در مورد نقش رضا پهلوی در جامعه و جنبش ایرنیان و آینده سیاسی ایران.... و غیره، نشان مشخص و بارزیست از اینکه سیستم حکومت پادشاهی به طور کلی‌، رو به زواله و دوران اون به پایان رسیده.

جوامع پیشرفت کردند و همونطور که مارکس گفته، وقتی‌ که یک نظام حکومتی جایش رو به یک نظام مدرن تر میده، دیگه اون جامعه نمیتونه به اون شکل حکومتی قدیم برگرده.

همونطور که در بالا یک نفر به حقوق بشر اشاره کرد، جوامع امروز از حقوق خودشون آگاه هستند و دیگه حاضر نیستند که زیر یوغ برده داری برند یا اسیر شاه و شاهنشاه بشن. مردم مالیات میدن و میخوان بفهمن که پولشون توسط دولت به کجا میره و برای چی‌ خرج میشه....میخوان در تصمیم گیری‌های دولت نقش اساسی‌ داشته باشند... اینها با نظام شاهنشاهی مغایره

رضا پهلوی هم این رو خیلی‌ بهتر و خیلی‌ زود تر از طفیلی‌های درباری قدیمی‌ فهمید

الان هم با هیچ حربه‌ای نمیشه از راهی‌ که داره میره منصرفش کرد

چاره همونه که قبلا گفتم

اگه برای ایران پادشاه جدید میخواین، باید برین به همین امید دانا متوسل بشین که بیاد پادشاهتون بشه