Yes he was a great man no doubt , however right noiw I think most Iranians would prefer Israel not to point their nukes toward Tehran and stop supporting separatists in Azarbijan and Kurdestan. 

MRX

"stop supporting separatists in Azarbijan and Kurdestan."

You have proof for that claim, or just repeating the claims by the warmongering Islamist fascists -"reformers" and all and their leftie allies?

The "200 nuke" remark was just a Powel quip.  

You have got to be kidding me, Where i am going to get a written proof from?   I don't see you providing any proofs for  7/24/365 blogs that you do in here. No body can deny close and cozy relationship between Israel  and Saudi Government and so called republic of Azarbijan and I honestly doubt its for exporting oranges to those countries! 

MRX,

Then you are just making unsubstantiated claims, just like the Islamist fascists routinely do.

This is the last time I respond to you. Take care.

Yup Fredie&Co... Whoever is not with "you",  surely is with "them"...Yup...

 MRX joon.

Azizam, saying "Yup"  twice, followed by "....." and then giving yourself green bilaakhs repeatedly, is not a good answer to Fred's question!

Look into one of thousands of propaganda  web sites set up by Islamist regime and you'll find the answer to Fred's question!

And what's this world coming to! I have to tell you guys how to do your jobs?

:)))))

What in a word of you talking about Hamal? I did not click on myself and frankly i don't care about thumnbs up or down from any body, nor do i care about your constant inslut to people on this site. Apparently that is all  you got!

Since fred blogs 7/24/365,  the responsibility falls on him and his team to provide us with a evidence and that fact that he does not and he is stumped on this one clearly indicates he has got nothing to substanciate his claims!

Normal definition:

When two parties are in a discussion and one asserts a claim that the other disputes, the one who asserts has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim.

Islamist fascist definition:

When two parties are in a discussion and one asserts a claim that the other disputes, the one who disputes the assertion has a burden of proof to disprove that claim.

It is the same in courts:

In the civilized court, it is the duty of the prosecutor to prove guilt.

In the Islamist fascist court, the accused must prove his/her innocence.

Ergo, it is useless to carry on any discussion when elementary basic rules of philosophy and logic are diametrically opposed. 

Tom Friedman:"He realized the the past often burries the future in that part of the world. He saw military solution failed time and again.  By initiating peace with Palestinians, he decided to burry the past for the future."

"Haaretz’s Anshel Pfeffer wrote that a Peres aide had told him in early 2010, “Shimon is doing everything to block Bibi and Barak’s crazy plan to attack Iran"


Thanks Shimon Peres.

God bless his soul

Source:

http://www.larryderfner.com/2016/09/29/shimon-peres-forgotten-role-in-stopping-israel-from-bombing-iran/