Many precedents are cited in defense of the President Obama’s Congress defying nuke deal with the Islamist fascists –“reformers” and all.

Of course not many pundits talk about the same kind of disastrous deal which was cut by President Clinton with the North Koreans; Wendy Sherman, who was the lead negotiator in that faulty deal, is also the lead nuke negotiator with the Islamist fascists.

What these days the proponents of the Obama nuke deal like to harp on is the “chemical weapons” deal he made with the genocidal Battists in Syria.

Battists who are accompanied in their daily pogroms by the Islamist fascist forces sent from Iran and their terrorist houseboy, Lebanese Hezbollah, have racked up nearly quarter of million murdered in the past four years, at times using chemical weapons.

In defense of the Obama – Islamist fascist nuke deal, offering Obama administration’s September 2013 agreement on removing chemical weapons from Syria as an example, Jen Psaki, the current State Department spokeswoman and incoming White House communications director has said:

“framework was not legally binding and was not subject to congressional approval, but laid the groundwork for “successful multilateral efforts to move forward.”

If success in Syria deal is meant the removal of chemical weapons, well, it ain’t so; the Battists are using it almost on daily basis against the civilian population.

In other words; defend the Obama-Islamist fascist nuke deal any which way you want, just don’t cite Syria as an example, and of course  blame the N. Korean nuke fiasco on the warmongers.

Sanction works, U.S. Senate get to it.