Cartoon by Revo

Does the downfall of the 'Shah of Shahs' hold lessons for the regime that deposed him?

Damien McElroy

The National: Earlier this week Iranian exiles, including some not long released from Tehran’s Evin prison, made their way to Cairo’s Al Rifa’i Mosque to pay respects at the tomb of the last Shah.

It is an event on July 27 that commemorates the loss of the imperial order and this year represented the 45th anniversary of the death of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.

It came just weeks after the Shah’s former patron, the US, bombed the regime that ousted the monarchy in what US President Donald Trump has called the 12-day war.

Author Scott Anderson has written a definitive account of the last days of the monarchy in King of Kings (Shahanshah) with the subtitle Unmaking of the Modern Middle East.

The current predicament of the religious leaders who preside over the new Iranian system could hardly be more present. His continuing conversations with Iranian contacts both within the country and in the diaspora mean that Anderson sees sentiment as having shifted to a more nationalistic plane, something that bolsters the Islamic Republic regime.

“I feel that the events of the last month have just set any [opposition] movement way back by years,” he tells The National from his west coast of the US home. “Now the regime can paint anybody who is in opposition as 'lackeys of the Americans who just bombed our country and killed several hundred of our innocent civilians'.”

There is a contrast with the beleaguered Shah in 1979 who saw the US as his last resort when one of the periodic outbursts of unrest turned into people power-style demonstrations that eventually overwhelmed his security forces. When it came to it, the book painfully illustrates how no help was there.

The Shah had gone to great lengths to woo America, something the book demonstrates very well. But in the 1970s America was distracted by its economic problems, not least the inflation caused by the oil price shock. Jimmy Carter, US president at the time, unlike Donald Trump, was not willing to intervene in the affairs of his ally. Worse, Washington’s Cold War considerations allowed a dithering president to place his faith in a misguided calculation on how Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini would rule.

“There started to be this idea within the Carter administration: ‘Well, you know, if the ayatollahs take over, that's not the worst thing for us, because at least they'll be anti-communist’. And really, in the last few months of the revolution, you saw this growing acquiescence of the Carter administration,” said Anderson.

It was an ill-fated visit to the White House in 1977, where the welcome ceremony was disrupted by tear gas and police clashing with anti-Shah protesters, that set off the fateful demonstrations in Iran. The incident on the Ellipse was broadcast on Iranian TV. As Gary Sick, a White House adviser at the time, observed, if Iranians saw a sparrow fall from the tree, it was the CIA that killed it. So too the live images of the Washington clashes sparked revolt in Iran.

What ultimately paved Khomeini’s way to power lay in the Shah himself. Anderson says Reza Shah believed his own Shahanshah propaganda on the country’s modernisation but failed to see how that created dangers. “Obviously the Shah was extending prosperity,” he said. “There was a huge number of scholarships. There was a certain lifestyle available in Tehran. The economic factor however isn't strong enough to save him. You had the streets flooded with young men, overwhelming men, coming from the countryside and from villages that really hadn't changed much of 300 years. Suddenly they are being exposed to this very westernised culture in the major Iranian cities. It would just cause a massive disjunction.”

It was no coincidence that the Shah lost his vizier Asadollah Alam, who died in April 1978. During one of Alam’s stints as prime minister, the state mobilised to crush massive demonstrations in 1963. It was also under Alam’s firm hand that the Shah staged his grandiose and grating Persepolis celebrations of 2,500 years of the Persian empire, described as the most expensive party ever staged.

“Alam was his alter-ego for 20-odd years, and actually he was the one who crushed things in 1963 as the prime minister at the time,” said Anderson. “He crushed the clerical revolts and oversaw Khomeini getting sent into exile. Ironically, the Americans saw that as the Shah's response. It wasn't the Shah's response, but the Shah took credit for it. The Americans finally saw the Shah as a strongman, and so that was kind of a secret that he always had with us.” >>>