So you and your team are proposing a sanctions by U.S senate for Saudi Arabia then, correct?  don't critisize them hard check may arrive late!

MRX

So you and your team are proposing a sanctions by U.S senate for Saudi Arabia then, correct?  don't critisize them hard check may arrive late!

_________________________________________

Aside not having anything to say when challenged to prove your lies and charges, your “comments” are consistently asinine.  

Lies Really? do  you and your team ever  read and check before posting some thing! this is about a woman in Saudi Arabia with no connections, NONE to Iran , and you are advocating sanctions, so I presume it is  against Saudi Government then right?  

MRX

Lies Really? do  you and your team ever  read and check before posting some thing! this is about a woman in Saudi Arabia with no connections, NONE to Iran , and you are advocating sanctions, so I presume it is  against Saudi Government then right?  

____________________________________

You are a liar, when you say “you and your team” and I challenge you to prove it, you say nothing.

So, liar, prove you charge.

Women in Iran and Arabia are under misogynistic apartheid laws, if you do not understand the connection that is your problem.

keep on trucking with your asinine comments.

Gentlemen...Gentlemen...

You are missing the point here.. Look at those Gorgeous legs and overall foxy-lady style body.

Pour yourselves a glass of Champaign and say Jamalesho!

It goes without saying that any subject discussed here has its supporters and opponents. Anyone in agreement with the core essence of materials presented by this or any other blogger can be considered as a person who shares the same goals and aspirations, hence a hypothetical teammate/colleague/collaborator in whatever goal one may be pursuing.

Asking for proof on such matters as a prerequisite for engaging in a discussion is another way of conceding to futility of one’s creed. 

KamalFM

It goes without saying that any subject discussed here has its supporters and opponents. Anyone in agreement with the core essence of materials presented by this or any other blogger can be considered as a person who shares the same goals and aspirations, hence a hypothetical teammate/colleague/collaborator in whatever goal one may be pursuing.

Asking for proof on such matters as a prerequisite for engaging in a discussion is another way of conceding to futility of one’s creed. 

___________________________________________

In other words, you can throw whatever accusations you feel like it, and no proof is required.

Maybe in your "creed" discussions are conducted with unsubstantiated accusation(s), but that is not the case in any legitimate discussions that I’m aware of. 

brother kamal

 i did not understand what you wrote. did you understand it yourself? but i liked it because it looked clever. where did you copy it from so i can do the same in future?

brother fred.

wearing mini skirt in public  is haraam. so it should not be allowed.

Brother Kamal sounds like Donald Trump junior and trump's lawyer when he plays with words:)))))

Maybe this is another "nothing burger" that is not more than nothing that people think was something!!!!

Brother Kamal sounds like Donald Trump junior and trump's lawyer when he plays with words:)))))

Maybe this is another "nothing burger" that is not more than nothing that people think was something!!!!

Brother Seyed Javad!

And how about this one from Iran? is it halal or haram??

Fred,

Whether you like it or not you are the voice of a certain group on this site or at the bare minimum you have sympathizers whom you can count on as allies. Is it too farfetched to call them members of your team? On the same token, I or anyone else for that matter can claim that there are people out there who value my or his/hers point of view. Do we need to issue membership cards before counting them as like-minded fellows? What part of above statement is considered baseless accusation?    

KamalFM

Fred,

Whether you like it or not you are the voice of a certain group on this site or at the bare minimum you have sympathizers whom you can count on as allies. Is it too farfetched to call them members of your team? On the same token, I or anyone else for that matter can claim that there are people out there who value my or his/hers point of view. Do we need to issue membership cards before counting them as like-minded fellows? What part of above statement is considered baseless accusation?    

______________________________________

As long as the comment section of my blogs are not used for hatemongering, as after 7 years of fruitlessly waiting for them to change their ways I had to block couple commenters, I have no problem with being accused of whatever, they don’t matter to me.

However, just to remind the accuser(s) that unlike the Islamist fascism, where the burden of proof is on the accused, in the free world it is on the accuser to prove the charge, once in a while I ask for their proof.

I believe in the unreformability of this fascism in Iran and am an advocate of backbreaking sanctions like the one emancipated South Africa. Most, if not all, those who use accusation as a tool in their comments do not believe in sanctions.  You too are among them and have said you are willing to wait “1000 years” for the Islamist fascism to reform. Being against me is therefore a given, however it does not need to be done through accusations.

You can play with words as you wish, “creed” this and “team” that, I’m a firm believer in the power of truth overcoming all the nonsense. 

Ajab ;) )

Quote from Reza Pahlavi interview with Associated Press (April 09, 2017):

Leave it to the so-called Iran-loving liberals to throw around the term s"sympathizer" and like-minded fellows like Freaking candy. In fact a very cursory look at their records puts on clear display that they have not represented anything but a  corrupt and vulgur ideology that not only helps the iranian people but makes things a lot worse for them.

There are teams and then there are Teams. Being a member of a team who wants a cancerous tumor uprooted and removed vs a team who wants nothing but the continuation of the misrable conditions, tells a lot about the personality of that "member".

Give it a rest.

"However, just to remind the accuser(s) that unlike the Islamist fascism, where the burden of proof is on the accused, in the free world it is on the accuser to prove the charge, once in a while I ask for their proof."

!!!?? Did you read what I wrote!?  I presented my case in a civil manner, clarifying what I had initially brought up in my first comment. At the end of my latter comment I asked a simple question that went unanswered. The irony of this whole exchange is that you are the one who is playing with words here and refusing to address the real issues. For the record, I’m against any artificial stimulant as a way of bringing democracy to our nation. We see the living proof of it in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is the height of absurdity to repeat history and expect a different outcome. My use of “a thousand year wait” term was a figure of speech and you well know it. (It was in the same spirit as what we say in Farsi: صد دفعه بهت گفتم   ) Iranian people have shown resilient and perseverance in fighting the nightmare of I.R.I. and they are on their path to the eventual victory. All you have to do is to compare the present status of affairs to the first couple of years after the revolution. It is the WILL of masses that is TAKING what belongs to them and certainly not the kind heartedness of the regime in GIVING. There is no point repeating myself when you are not adding anything of substance, thus, I’m signing off. Till later.    

Saudis, Islam and everything below the waste.........

http://iroon.com/irtn/photo/7987/

KamalFM

You can play with words all you want, figure of speech, creed and all that, the bottom line is the burden of proof is on the accuser.

The outcome of your solution to the unreformable Islamist fascism is exactly your figure of speech, the wait for 1000 years.

Fred

I just love the way to cut through the manure and stick straight to your point,

That is the kinda attitude this world needs more of.

Isn't it funny that the more something proves not to work and be effective , it would become more "substantial' and of substance, vs other more practical and feasible solutions?

Shame on some people...