رضا پهلوی نه تنها از وظایف خود نسبت به قانون اساسی مشروطه عدول کرده است، بلکه اینقدر شرافت هم نداشته که استعفا دهد تا رسماً جانشینی -ولو موقت- برای مقام پادشاهی قانون اساسی انتخاب شود. چنین آدم ریاکاری مقام پادشاهی را در خواب خواهد دید. او حتی برای یک مقام در جمهوری هم اعتبار شخصی ندارد. با همین بی شرافتی بود که از طرفداران پادشاهی پول جمع کرد و دفتر و دستک -اکنون ورشکسته- شورای ملی را راه انداخت.
پادوهای مبلغ او هم به جایی نخواهند رسید. بیپرنسیپی ارزش تبلیغ ندارد.
آیا اولویت یک پادشاه نباید قانون اساسی باشد و نه وصیت نامه حتی اگر از پدری باشد ایرانساز؟
Kheir ...
Aval be onvaneh vareseh Tajo Takht eeshan bayad Parcham gara nationalism va Padeshahi bashad.
Here are his Duties in order of priority :
Before having RIGHTS an heir has DUTIES
He becomes King upon his fathers death
Hence the expression The Shah is Dead Long Live the Shah
this exists in all monarchies
As King or King Apparent his political responsibilities have nothing to do with his bloodline duties. A Monarch remains Monarch unless beheaded either physically or metaphorically.
He beheaded himself metaphorically with this latest interview.
As King including in exile the Monarch has a duty to secure his dynasty's future
with male offsprings as demanded by the constitution. if not another male successor within his own family can be named by him to secure the dynastical future.
His daughters remain princess' of royal blood but they cannot claim Kingship under the current draft of the Constitution which even Shapour Bakhktiar swore to restore and for which General Rahimi up to his disgraceful trial upheld to the death.
Not our King turned Self proclaimed "Shahrvand"
So the Will of the Father especially in Iranian psyche and family values are Sacred.
The Parliamentary nature of the Monarchy is a political process not a Sacred One.
A Monarchy even in a constitutional one like Sweden or UK or Thailand and here we are speaking about countries where democracy has a far more older and functional reality than in IRan ... well even in the most advanced parliamentary democracies like in Europe the Monarch or the heir have obligations and they cannot just say anything without being held accountable.
Advocating Republcianism for example is Treason in ANY Monarchy.
Pardoning his father's enemies worse giving them interviews or taking people close to them as staff members ( nazilla golestan was working with Mohsen Sazegara founder of Iran's Sepah Pasdaran responsible for crimes and execution of our generals and civil servants) even before ever conquering the throne is Considered Treason
Not defending his father's legacy but instead sitting with people who contributed to the execution of some of our most bravest and honorable officers and civil servants irrespective of what the families of these brave patriots who lost their loved ones is considered as Treason and Insenstive to say the least.
Signing the Manshoor 91 of Ramin Jahanbegloo upon the creation of his unconstotutional Shora in a sign of solidarity with people close to the IRI rafsanjani Lobby NIAC which also signed that Petition is Treason !
Discouraging Pro Monarchy Chants and not even standing up for those arrestred and instead branding them as "fascists"
Is Treason !
Refusing to defend the term PErsian Gulf in an Arab Media Outlet may not be Treason as some of my hardline likeminds may claim
but given the territorial threats and current regional dangers
it is reckless and stupid move to say the least .
So No the Role of an heir is not to obey the Constitution ( which he hasn't anyway) but to secure his dynasty's future.
In other words and in the following order of priorities this is what his duties are :
One: Defend the Monarchy and his Dad who never abdicated and hence never acknowldeged the revolution as legitimate.
Two: Defend, protect and preserve the 1906 Constitution during his lifetime even if he dies in exile and pass on that to his successors.
Three : advocate democracy and human rights only within the framework of what the 1906 Constittiion allows with at best suggesting amendments once it is restored again but not throw it in the dustbins of history as he himself did and against his father's last will.
Doing otherwise he disqualifies himself as even spokesperson of his dynasty and can be impeached for treason.
All this is irrelevant given that he doesn't give a sh@t about all those who sacrificed themselves in the defense of the realm and to whom he clealy Lied under Oath !
So he decided to betray and gamble his legitimacy and squander his good name all by himself and with nobody's help but his own lack of experience.
اگر این اولویت را قبول دارید، بفرمایید شاهزاده رضا پهلوی به کدام بخش از قانون اساسی مشروطه ایران "خیانت" کرده؟
The Constitution requires the heir to secure it's dynastical future. The 1906 Constitution requires a Son ( something which can be amended very
simply once the constitution is again restored
as has been the case in Sweden where the monarch asked parliament to vote his eldest daughter as"crown Princess" in 1978.
Great Britain only recognized the possibility of having a first born girl the same rights as a first born boy only recently prior to William and Kate's first born child in fear that if the first born is a girl that she may not ascend the throne:
The Current Queen was not subject to this law given that she had no brothers so her right to the throne was not subject to doubt.
However Crown Prince Reza who perfectly knows his duty as head of the Dynasty is to secure his dynastical claims for future generations did not even bother to bring this up. He is the custodian of the royal dynasty not it's owner. If he refuses the Crown other's within the family of make decent can rightly claim the throne ... if not his dynasty becomes caduc and he can be impeached based on Lese MAjesty Laws that prevail in every monarchy in the world including constitutional monarchies as someone who has betrayed his dynasty.
That Crown Prince Reza refuses kingship is one thing ... to condemn his dynasty's future is another.
King Juan Carlos of Spain was not even born on Spanish Soil but in Rome ITaly.
His grandfather was toppled in a revolution and two successive republics were followed by a Fascist government in Spain.
As such King Juan Carlos' father fell from grace and was not able to proclaim himself as King. the Dynasty jumped a generation because the Royal succession is based on
Royal Blood. Juan Carlos was able to claim the throne as King as a result
With a little help from the "fascists
Only after he was declared King and only after the Fascist dictator who helped him ascend the throne did he go ahead and call for a referendum on the democratic institutions in his country to make Spain a genuine parliamentary democracy.
But never did he question his royal claim and his abdication a few years ago was merely the result of pressure by public opinion which forced him to step down over the financial scandals of his household and notably daughter's husband as well as his deemed elephant hunting which was an unfair accusation given that he had long given up on hunting due to his frail health.
But RP far from even suggestiong that went about to call for a referendum on something which was unnegotiable from a constitutionalist point of view.
He gave up the fight even before it started and then went even further he insulted the monarchists who asked for clarification by saying arrogantly that if anyone refuses his daughter as potential queen he will go an campaign for the first IRanain female president ( a la Shirin Ebadi Massalan)
So defacto the man is a Traitor to his royal household and to the very concept of even a Constitutional monarchy let alone monarchy per se because he even rejects the legal procedures in the way he expresses himself in regard to the dynastical laws which prevail in every royal household.
Even the Qajars with all their faults never had an heir to be so disgracefully insulting and undignified towards people who supported his father and dynasty all along.
Calling the petitioners amongst whom Roxanna Ganji or MAnoutchehr Razmara whose brother was a PM of IRan and slained and he himself who was minister in the last Imperial govenrment of Iran under Shapour Bakhtira
And to call them IRI Agents as the only form of response is unpredecedented and arrogant.
So it is a betrayal and Treason given that as custodian of not only the constitution but the monarchy and his dynasty's future he first and foremost has DUTIES NOT RIGHTS !
در ضمن، رضا پهلوی به کدامین بخش وصیت نامه زنده یاد محمدرضا شاه ایرانساز "خیانت" کرده است؟
One : By calling for a referendum for a New Constitution
Two: Not securing his dynasty with male heirs
Three: Not naming a male successor within his royal household as allowed by the Constitution if he himself cannot become King or refuses to take on that responsibility .
Four : Openly claiming that he would support a Republic if his eldest
daughter is not accepted as
Heir.
His own father divorced Queen Soraya because she had no children
and Divorced first wife Queen Fawzia for not having a Son
RP went and married someone who is not even of royal blood and who some claim her father was an Anti Shah because his lands were confiscated ( I don't know if that is true or a rumor ) but either way he has made no personal sacrifices to his own happiness compared to his illustrious father and grandfather.
These are just a few of many comments and actions for which the current incumbent and incompetent heir to 25 centuries of Monachy is guilty of and for which he would be impeached in any other Monarchy in the world or even royal family.
Quite Recently the King of Romania wiped his grandson from his succession rights because he believes he did not respect the royal protocol.
Romania today is a republic where the royal family is today living but they have not given up their claim to the throne
A Constitutional Monarchist Party is actively working to restore them back to their rightful place through democratic parliamentary means.
Same in Serbia where both families enjoy a very high popularity.
Never did any of these royal families question their rights.
Even CNN Richard Quest interviewing the Crown Prince of Serbia had to
Where as Christian Amanpour interviewed RP upon the creation of his Shora under the Islamic Republic Flag and never addressed him as Prince but merely Reza Pahlavi
Even on BBC with the Islamic Flag to represent him which means he clearly acknowledges what no Monarchist and not even the shah or Shapour Bakhtiar accepted the legitimacy of : :
با سپاس از پاسخ جامع، برای اینکه موضع شما را بهتر درک کنم، متن قانون اساسی مشروطه در اینجاست، مهربانی بکن و بگو دقیقا شاهزاده رضا پهلوی از کدام مفاد و اصول آن تخطی کرده است.
Art. 36. The constitutional monarchy of Persia is vested in the person of His Imperial Majesty Sultan Muhammad ‘Ali Shah Qajar (may God prolong his sovereignty!) and in his heirs, generation after generation.
Art. 37. The succession to the Throne, in case there being more than one son, passes to the eldest son of the King whose mother is a Princess and of PersianRACE. In case the King should have no male issue, the eldest male of the Royal Family who is next of kin shall rank next in succession to the Throne. If, however, in the case supposed above, male heirs should subsequently to be born to the King, the succession will de jure revert to such heir.
I cannot go through the entire document for you
there are other legal issues on which I am not an expert but it does not take rocket science to see that RP has failed on the above points.
He called for Replacing the former Constitution by a new One
In otherwords he said it had no more legitimacy
We Already had the constitution and he goes about creates his shora and votes himself in as the spokesperson for a shora for free elections to create a NEW Constitution.
NOT replace the IRI Constitution with the 1906 Constitution but REPLACE IT WITH A NEW ONE !
That in itself is betraying the constitution is it not ?
Bakhtiar NEVER gave up on that Constitution yet he paid with his life :
RP has via interviews and Without EVER saying it openly in front of his genuine supporters
Given that he is a SELFISH COWARD ! ... He decided to to do so via a Foreign government funded Radio Farda and it's own brand of IRI apologist Journalists !
من يادمه كه اين پسره سوگند پادشاهى خورد. درست ميگم؟ حالا زده زيرش كه بشه رئيس جمهور يه تكه اى از ايرانستان؟ بخدا كه روح باباى خدابيامرزش الان در عذابه. البته اون قانون اساسى مشروطيت هم به خاطر مردسالارى و شريعت مداريش چندان چنگى بدل نميزد؛ بهمين خاطر، والاحضرت شاهدخت شهناز پهلوى بهترين گزينه براى جلوس بر تخت طاووس محسوب ميگردد.
من يادمه كه اين پسره سوگند پادشاهى خورد. درست ميگم؟ حالا زده زيرش كه بشه رئيس جمهور يه تكه اى از ايرانستان؟ بخدا كه روح باباى خدابيامرزش الان در عذابه. البته اون قانون اساسى مشروطيت هم به خاطر مردسالارى و شريعت مداريش چندان چنگى بدل نميزد؛ بهمين خاطر، والاحضرت شاهدخت شهناز پهلوى بهترين گزينه براى جلوس بر تخت طاووس محسوب ميگردد.
Please login or register to be able to flag this cartoon.
لطفا دسته بندی که ارتباط نزدیکتری با نظر شما در مورد این مطلب دارد را انتخاب نمایید. ما آن را بررسی نموده و تصمیم گیری خواهیم نمود. ضمنا از این قابلیت سوء استفاده ننمایید. از آن در مواردی استفاده نمایید که نگرانی شدیدی در مورد محتوای یک مطلب دارید.
رضا پهلوی نه تنها از وظایف خود نسبت به قانون اساسی مشروطه عدول کرده است، بلکه اینقدر شرافت هم نداشته که استعفا دهد تا رسماً جانشینی -ولو موقت- برای مقام پادشاهی قانون اساسی انتخاب شود. چنین آدم ریاکاری مقام پادشاهی را در خواب خواهد دید. او حتی برای یک مقام در جمهوری هم اعتبار شخصی ندارد. با همین بی شرافتی بود که از طرفداران پادشاهی پول جمع کرد و دفتر و دستک -اکنون ورشکسته- شورای ملی را راه انداخت.
پادوهای مبلغ او هم به جایی نخواهند رسید. بیپرنسیپی ارزش تبلیغ ندارد.
benross
اگر علاقه داشتید وارد بحثی سازنده شوید، مهربانی کرده و بنویسید کدامین وظایف و بندهای قانون مشروطه را شاهزاده رضا پهلوی از اجرایشان عدول کرده.
اگر همچنان حوصله داشتید، بفرمایید ریاکاری او در چه بوده که موجب فقدان شرافت او شده.
عنوان مطلب شما پاسخ به پرسش شماست. من برای این آدم بیش از این ارزش قائل نیستم که بازار مبلغانش را گرم کنم.
یکی از پرسشهای من در بارۀ وظایف و بندهای قانون اساسی بود که گفنید او از اجرای آنها عدول کرده. ولی اگر حوصله پاسخ دادن ندارید برای من قابل احترام است.
Okay, fine. Let's move on then.
در این یک مورد، فرد، کاملا با شما موافقم.
صرفنظر از اختلاف نظرها و عقاید که با رضا پهلوی ممکنه داشته باشم، بخاطر این محکم ایستادنش در برابر تفالههای شاه پرست، او رو واقعا تحسین میکنم.
Betrayal of his father's will
Shah of Iran's Last Will Read by the Empress Farah
RP is a disgrace and will be remembered as such in the pages of history.
داریوش؛
چون به تجربه مجازی میدانم مرد با فرهنگ، دقیق و اهل منطق هستی، مهربانی کن و به این سئوالات اگر علاقه داری پاسخ بده:
آیا اولویت یک پادشاه نباید قانون اساسی باشد و نه وصیت نامه حتی اگر از پدری باشد ایرانساز؟
اگر این اولویت را قبول دارید، بفرمایید شاهزاده رضا پهلوی به کدام بخش از قانون اساسی مشروطه ایران "خیانت" کرده؟
در ضمن، رضا پهلوی به کدامین بخش وصیت نامه زنده یاد محمدرضا شاه ایرانساز "خیانت" کرده است؟
آیا اولویت یک پادشاه نباید قانون اساسی باشد و نه وصیت نامه حتی اگر از پدری باشد ایرانساز؟
Kheir ...
Aval be onvaneh vareseh Tajo Takht eeshan bayad Parcham gara nationalism va Padeshahi bashad.
Here are his Duties in order of priority :
Before having RIGHTS an heir has DUTIES
He becomes King upon his fathers death
Hence the expression The Shah is Dead Long Live the Shah
this exists in all monarchies
As King or King Apparent his political responsibilities have nothing to do with his bloodline duties. A Monarch remains Monarch unless beheaded either physically or metaphorically.
He beheaded himself metaphorically with this latest interview.
As King including in exile the Monarch has a duty to secure his dynasty's future
with male offsprings as demanded by the constitution. if not another male successor within his own family can be named by him to secure the dynastical future.
His daughters remain princess' of royal blood but they cannot claim Kingship under the current draft of the Constitution which even Shapour Bakhktiar swore to restore and for which General Rahimi up to his disgraceful trial upheld to the death.
Not our King turned Self proclaimed "Shahrvand"
So the Will of the Father especially in Iranian psyche and family values are Sacred.
The Parliamentary nature of the Monarchy is a political process not a Sacred One.
A Monarchy even in a constitutional one like Sweden or UK or Thailand and here we are speaking about countries where democracy has a far more older and functional reality than in IRan ... well even in the most advanced parliamentary democracies like in Europe the Monarch or the heir have obligations and they cannot just say anything without being held accountable.
Advocating Republcianism for example is Treason in ANY Monarchy.
Pardoning his father's enemies worse giving them interviews or taking people close to them as staff members ( nazilla golestan was working with Mohsen Sazegara founder of Iran's Sepah Pasdaran responsible for crimes and execution of our generals and civil servants) even before ever conquering the throne is Considered Treason
Not defending his father's legacy but instead sitting with people who contributed to the execution of some of our most bravest and honorable officers and civil servants irrespective of what the families of these brave patriots who lost their loved ones is considered as Treason and Insenstive to say the least.
Signing the Manshoor 91 of Ramin Jahanbegloo upon the creation of his unconstotutional Shora in a sign of solidarity with people close to the IRI rafsanjani Lobby NIAC which also signed that Petition is Treason !
Discouraging Pro Monarchy Chants and not even standing up for those arrestred and instead branding them as "fascists"
Is Treason !
Refusing to defend the term PErsian Gulf in an Arab Media Outlet may not be Treason as some of my hardline likeminds may claim
but given the territorial threats and current regional dangers
it is reckless and stupid move to say the least .
So No the Role of an heir is not to obey the Constitution ( which he hasn't anyway) but to secure his dynasty's future.
In other words and in the following order of priorities this is what his duties are :
One: Defend the Monarchy and his Dad who never abdicated and hence never acknowldeged the revolution as legitimate.
Two: Defend, protect and preserve the 1906 Constitution during his lifetime even if he dies in exile and pass on that to his successors.
Three : advocate democracy and human rights only within the framework of what the 1906 Constittiion allows with at best suggesting amendments once it is restored again but not throw it in the dustbins of history as he himself did and against his father's last will.
Doing otherwise he disqualifies himself as even spokesperson of his dynasty and can be impeached for treason.
All this is irrelevant given that he doesn't give a sh@t about all those who sacrificed themselves in the defense of the realm and to whom he clealy Lied under Oath !
So he decided to betray and gamble his legitimacy and squander his good name all by himself and with nobody's help but his own lack of experience.
اگر این اولویت را قبول دارید، بفرمایید شاهزاده رضا پهلوی به کدام بخش از قانون اساسی مشروطه ایران "خیانت" کرده؟
The Constitution requires the heir to secure it's dynastical future. The 1906 Constitution requires a Son ( something which can be amended very
simply once the constitution is again restored
as has been the case in Sweden where the monarch asked parliament to vote his eldest daughter as"crown Princess" in 1978.
Great Britain only recognized the possibility of having a first born girl the same rights as a first born boy only recently prior to William and Kate's first born child in fear that if the first born is a girl that she may not ascend the throne:
British Monarchy Removes Gender Rules Regarding Royal Succession
The Current Queen was not subject to this law given that she had no brothers so her right to the throne was not subject to doubt.
However Crown Prince Reza who perfectly knows his duty as head of the Dynasty is to secure his dynastical claims for future generations did not even bother to bring this up. He is the custodian of the royal dynasty not it's owner. If he refuses the Crown other's within the family of make decent can rightly claim the throne ... if not his dynasty becomes caduc and he can be impeached based on Lese MAjesty Laws that prevail in every monarchy in the world including constitutional monarchies as someone who has betrayed his dynasty.
That Crown Prince Reza refuses kingship is one thing ... to condemn his dynasty's future is another.
King Juan Carlos of Spain was not even born on Spanish Soil but in Rome ITaly.
His grandfather was toppled in a revolution and two successive republics were followed by a Fascist government in Spain.
As such King Juan Carlos' father fell from grace and was not able to proclaim himself as King. the Dynasty jumped a generation because the Royal succession is based on
Royal Blood. Juan Carlos was able to claim the throne as King as a result
With a little help from the "fascists
Only after he was declared King and only after the Fascist dictator who helped him ascend the throne did he go ahead and call for a referendum on the democratic institutions in his country to make Spain a genuine parliamentary democracy.
But never did he question his royal claim and his abdication a few years ago was merely the result of pressure by public opinion which forced him to step down over the financial scandals of his household and notably daughter's husband as well as his deemed elephant hunting which was an unfair accusation given that he had long given up on hunting due to his frail health.
But RP far from even suggestiong that went about to call for a referendum on something which was unnegotiable from a constitutionalist point of view.
He gave up the fight even before it started and then went even further he insulted the monarchists who asked for clarification by saying arrogantly that if anyone refuses his daughter as potential queen he will go an campaign for the first IRanain female president ( a la Shirin Ebadi Massalan)
So defacto the man is a Traitor to his royal household and to the very concept of even a Constitutional monarchy let alone monarchy per se because he even rejects the legal procedures in the way he expresses himself in regard to the dynastical laws which prevail in every royal household.
Even the Qajars with all their faults never had an heir to be so disgracefully insulting and undignified towards people who supported his father and dynasty all along.
Calling the petitioners amongst whom Roxanna Ganji or MAnoutchehr Razmara whose brother was a PM of IRan and slained and he himself who was minister in the last Imperial govenrment of Iran under Shapour Bakhtira
And to call them IRI Agents as the only form of response is unpredecedented and arrogant.
So it is a betrayal and Treason given that as custodian of not only the constitution but the monarchy and his dynasty's future he first and foremost has DUTIES NOT RIGHTS !
در ضمن، رضا پهلوی به کدامین بخش وصیت نامه زنده یاد محمدرضا شاه ایرانساز "خیانت" کرده است؟
One : By calling for a referendum for a New Constitution
Two: Not securing his dynasty with male heirs
Three: Not naming a male successor within his royal household as allowed by the Constitution if he himself cannot become King or refuses to take on that responsibility .
Four : Openly claiming that he would support a Republic if his eldest
daughter is not accepted as
Heir.
His own father divorced Queen Soraya because she had no children
and Divorced first wife Queen Fawzia for not having a Son
RP went and married someone who is not even of royal blood and who some claim her father was an Anti Shah because his lands were confiscated ( I don't know if that is true or a rumor ) but either way he has made no personal sacrifices to his own happiness compared to his illustrious father and grandfather.
These are just a few of many comments and actions for which the current incumbent and incompetent heir to 25 centuries of Monachy is guilty of and for which he would be impeached in any other Monarchy in the world or even royal family.
Quite Recently the King of Romania wiped his grandson from his succession rights because he believes he did not respect the royal protocol.
Romania today is a republic where the royal family is today living but they have not given up their claim to the throne
A Constitutional Monarchist Party is actively working to restore them back to their rightful place through democratic parliamentary means.
Same in Serbia where both families enjoy a very high popularity.
Never did any of these royal families question their rights.
Even CNN Richard Quest interviewing the Crown Prince of Serbia had to
address him as Your Royal Highness
ROYAL FORUM: Crown Prince of Serbia Seeks to Restore The Monarchy
Where as Christian Amanpour interviewed RP upon the creation of his Shora under the Islamic Republic Flag and never addressed him as Prince but merely Reza Pahlavi
CNN's Christiane Amanpour interview with Reza Pahlavi
So why the double standards ?
Simple
The once Reza Shah Dovom
Himself decided not to be addressed as such
Even on BBC with the Islamic Flag to represent him which means he clearly acknowledges what no Monarchist and not even the shah or Shapour Bakhtiar accepted the legitimacy of : :
IRAN'S FUTURE - BBC Presenter Huw Edwards Interviews Reza Pahlavi (2014)
Well Shahrvand Reza Has ...
I hope I have answered to your questions in the best of my ability.
Best
DK
داریوش،
با سپاس از پاسخ جامع، برای اینکه موضع شما را بهتر درک کنم، متن قانون اساسی مشروطه در اینجاست، مهربانی بکن و بگو دقیقا شاهزاده رضا پهلوی از کدام مفاد و اصول آن تخطی کرده است.
English Version ( from Qajar Era prevails in PAhlavi Era) here :
http://fis-iran.org/en/resources/legaldoc/iranconstitution
The 1906 Constitution is Not Secular :
Art 1 and Art II
The Heir can only be of Male Decent :
Art. 36. The constitutional monarchy of Persia is vested in the person of His Imperial Majesty Sultan Muhammad ‘Ali Shah Qajar (may God prolong his sovereignty!) and in his heirs, generation after generation.
Art. 37. The succession to the Throne, in case there being more than one son, passes to the eldest son of the King whose mother is a Princess and of Persian RACE. In case the King should have no male issue, the eldest male of the Royal Family who is next of kin shall rank next in succession to the Throne. If, however, in the case supposed above, male heirs should subsequently to be born to the King, the succession will de jure revert to such heir.
I cannot go through the entire document for you
there are other legal issues on which I am not an expert but it does not take rocket science to see that RP has failed on the above points.
More Food for thought:
Cyrus Amir-Mokri: How Truly Democratic Was the 1906 Constitution In The First Place?
PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY: How Does the British Constitutional Monarchy Truly Operate ?
متوجه نشدم، پس شاهزاده رضا پهلوی از قانون اساسی مشروطه تخطی نکرده؟
Fred Jan Can You read ?
He called for Replacing the former Constitution by a new One
In otherwords he said it had no more legitimacy
We Already had the constitution and he goes about creates his shora and votes himself in as the spokesperson for a shora for free elections to create a NEW Constitution.
NOT replace the IRI Constitution with the 1906 Constitution but REPLACE IT WITH A NEW ONE !
That in itself is betraying the constitution is it not ?
Bakhtiar NEVER gave up on that Constitution yet he paid with his life :
Arriving in Paris Bakhtiar vows to restore Constitution & Blasts Bazargan's Provisionary Government
RP has via interviews and Without EVER saying it openly in front of his genuine supporters
Given that he is a SELFISH COWARD ! ... He decided to to do so via a Foreign government funded Radio Farda and it's own brand of IRI apologist Journalists !
بله، برای همین هم متوجه نمیشوم که به زعم شما شاهزاده رضا پهلوی از کدام اصل قانون اساسی مشروطه تخطی کرده.
برای نمونه اصل هشتم: اهالی مملکت ایران در مقابل قانون دولتی متساوی الحقوق خواهد بود.
برای داشتن بحثی مفید، بسیار علاقه دارم که اصل قانون اساسی را ذکر کنید و بعد دلیلی که فکر میکنید رضا پهلوی در بیرون از کشور از آن تخطی کرده است.
Massoud Sadr, مسعود صدر « نقدي بر سخنان شازده رضا پهلوي »؛
من يادمه كه اين پسره سوگند پادشاهى خورد. درست ميگم؟ حالا زده زيرش كه بشه رئيس جمهور يه تكه اى از ايرانستان؟ بخدا كه روح باباى خدابيامرزش الان در عذابه. البته اون قانون اساسى مشروطيت هم به خاطر مردسالارى و شريعت مداريش چندان چنگى بدل نميزد؛ بهمين خاطر، والاحضرت شاهدخت شهناز پهلوى بهترين گزينه براى جلوس بر تخت طاووس محسوب ميگردد.
محض یادآوری:
زن و دخترتو گاییدم. فرد...
من يادمه كه اين پسره سوگند پادشاهى خورد. درست ميگم؟ حالا زده زيرش كه بشه رئيس جمهور يه تكه اى از ايرانستان؟ بخدا كه روح باباى خدابيامرزش الان در عذابه. البته اون قانون اساسى مشروطيت هم به خاطر مردسالارى و شريعت مداريش چندان چنگى بدل نميزد؛ بهمين خاطر، والاحضرت شاهدخت شهناز پهلوى بهترين گزينه براى جلوس بر تخت طاووس محسوب ميگردد.
"مسئله برای من دغدغه پادشاهی از روز اول نبوده و نیست" خوب این حرف را ۳۰ سال پیش میزدی و میرفتی پی کارت. مگه ما کمبود شهروند داریم؟