Her promiscuity with the Islamic Republic Apologists notably NIAC disqualifies her to even lecture on the notion of freedom and democracy.

I have nothing against her per say I am sure she is a good person and means well. However life is all about timing. All this stuff that she says now, she should have said it when they awarded the prize to her , when the ears and eyes of the world was on her that might have made a difference for some political prisoners in Iran ,but  instead she talked about gitmo, palestine and the usual shit liberal idiots in U.S and Europe talk about. So now her fifteen minutes of fame is gone and all these talks are just talk and talk is cheap!

Her talks aren't cheap ... What did you think ?

Just like the Clintons They pay her generously for her appearances and travel costs ...

And all that to talk sh@t to a bunch of bimbo Journalists looking for attention without ever apologizing for shouting Marg Bar Shah in the first place.

Khak too saresh 

she is not the only one! There are a lot of dopey people out there  who are paid to travel and lecture bowl shit right and left......

The issue I have is,  it matters when you publisize or make a point and when you make a decision base on that. The great Dr. Bakhtiar warned the whole ignorant nation in 1978 if mullah's come to power will be a dooms day and he tried his best to prevent it. Now 37 years later any one  can say IRI is horrible so what?. Same goes in here, the time for her to make a solid point and potentialy make a difference in some people's life  was years a go, not now. no one cares now . she can go on lecture series to all the dopey universities out there and have interviews with NPR it is not going to change anything.