Yesterday, without much fanfare, the U.S. House of representatives handed fantastic news to Iranians inside occupied Iran and in diaspora spread out all over the globe.
Those who know Iran and Iranians deserve a much better treatment than the raw deal they’ve been getting for the past forty years from the unreformable, warmongering and international terror sponsoring Islamist fascists –“reformers” and all- should be elated.
News:
“House Democratic Whip Steny H. Hoyer (MD) released the following statement today on the bipartisan agreement on Russia and Iran sanctions legislation:
“I’m pleased that both parties in the House and Senate have reached agreement on sanctions legislation that will hold Russia and Iran accountable for their destabilizing actions around the world. The legislation ensures that both the Majority and Minority are able to exercise our oversight role over the Administration’s implementation of sanctions.”
U.S. senate has already approved, 98 to 2 votes, this sanctions package, which among others, targets and designates the Islamist fascists’ Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist organization.
Barring a last minute unforeseen turn of event, because of the almost unanimous support from both Democrats and Republicans for the bill, making it veto proof, president’s signature is a foregone conclusion.
This means the official end of the eight disastrous years of Obama appeasement policy. It also means at long last the Revolutionary Guards Corps, the chief implement and enforcer of warmongering, international terror and the savage suppression of Iranians inside the country is labeled as what it has always been, a terrorist organization.
The vehement opposition of the Islamist fascists’ lobbies like NIAC, others who are in one way or another heavily invested in the continuation of the status quo, including the Islamist fascists who in recent days warned against passage of this bill, makes it clear that it is fantastic news for Iranian opposition, not to be mistaken with the critics who want to "reform" and continue the Islamist fascism's rule.
After all, in the past forty years it has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, the national interests of Iran and Iranians are directly the opposite of the Islamist fascists.
Sanction works, U.S. House, get to it.
Ps. like a mafia organizatioon, Revolutionary Guards Corps has expropriated and now directly or indirectly owns much of what is passed as Iran’s economy.
This bill soon to be law, will attack the stranglehold Islamist fascists’ Revolutionary Guards Corps has on Iran’s economy and the sanctions it has imposed on the hapless Iranian people.
KamalFM
Please post your comment in the English section in English so people who do not know Persian can read it and respond to it if they wish to do so.
ps. Pity those who live in freedom and yet generously are willing to “wait 1000 years” for the murderous Islamists fascists to reform.
Speaking of foreign interference in domestic affairs, let the backlash from Russian meddling in the U.S. politics be a lesson to you on how a responsible citizen should react.
Those who equate helping Iranian people getting rid of the unreformable, warmongering Islamist fascists as have foreigners interfering in the domestic affair of Iran, need to name a single country which has gained its liberation without help from outside, that includes America as well.
Ps. comparing the interference of Russia into domestic affair of America, a democratic country, with Iran is the height of either being uninformed or wanton demagoguery.
"Those who equate helping Iranian people getting rid of the unreformable, warmongering Islamist fascists as have foreigners interfering in the domestic affair of Iran, need to name a single country which has gained its liberation without help from outside, that includes America as well."
Are you serious? Gaining liberation is a subjective matter. A successful collective uprising in ousting a tyrant is a better gage to be used and you don’t have to go far to look for a precedent. You guessed it, Iran in 1979. A more recent case would be Tunisia.
"Ps. comparing the interference of Russia into domestic affair of America, a democratic country, with Iran is the height of either being uninformed or wanton demagoguery."
Twisting and spinning words will not be getting you anywhere. You have heard of the Persian expression: در مثل مناقشه نیست.
So, keep hiding behind your hollow words. Come to think of it, what other choice do you have? None.
Again, demagoguery ain’t gone do it, name one country which has gained its liberation from tyranny without outside help.
Fred
You might as well be talking to your coffee table...
If the people inside Iran wanted or could have freed themselves from the mullahcratic nezam, they would have done it by now. 40 years is a lifetime.
True that.
SOmething that is so freaking obvious and stares you in the face. People love this and all the whinning and bellyaching that goes with it.
I mean if their sense of pride and nationalism is that strong that everytime there is a threat they rallly around the mollahs, good luck expecting, effectuating, creating any kinda fundamental changes there.
RP, Mojahaadeen, all ...pack your bags and find another country to mess around with.
Just a tweak here and a little twist there, the people and this IRI regime are good to go.
Whatever happened to good ole' days of regime changes and coups that the West was so good at decades ago? Was the last one bringing the esslamist regime to power? Have the Brits lost their touch or is it good business to allow the theorcacy to remain in power and keep milkin' it?
KamalFM
یعنی پفیوزتر، خائن تر، نون به نرخ روز خورتر، پست تر و خودفروش تر از شماها میمونان ناقص العقل آخوند خواه هم حیوانی در جهان هست؟
اره هست! ارباب پفیوز قرمساقت، تر تر تازی (تریتا پارسی)!
Generally, I don’t bother reacting to the foulmouthed low lives like this fellow. It doesn’t bother me and as a matter of fact I wear it like a badge of honor. I just wonder how is it that the owner of this blog cries foul anytime he is subjected to the same treatment but has no qualms witnessing his buddies using profanity against those expressing opposing views! Isn’t that the definition of hypocrisy? And for the record, traitors are those who know for fact the deplorable, wretched living condition of our Iraqi and Afghani neighbors and still promote military intervention by the U.S. military. Shame on you.
Just to prove that you are not a fibber, show me when I have “cried foul" when subjected to attack. I allowed couple of sewer mouths to attack me for 7 years, even you have had the temerity to label me a “traitor” .
As to other commenters attacking, when both parties are present in the bog, especially someone like you who is very generous in labeling and attacking, don’t act coy, it is unbecoming with your track record, set the right example instead.
Again, you are at it, playing with words. I stand behind every word that I have used to describe you or anyone else. I have never called anyone an animal or a prostitute. And your vain effort to equate the two speaks volume about your character.
You made a claim that I have “cried foul”, I challenged you to prove it. Either have the intellectual honesty to prove your claim, or the decency to take it back.
Malcolm describes the difference between the "house Negro" and the "field Negro." Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. 23 January 1963.
Transcribed text from audio excerpt. [read entire speech]
"So you have two types of Negro. The old type and the new type. Most of you know the old type. When you read about him in history during slavery he was called "Uncle Tom." He was the house Negro. And during slavery you had two Negroes. You had the house Negro and the field Negro.
The house Negro usually lived close to his master. He dressed like his master. He wore his master's second-hand clothes. He ate food that his master left on the table. And he lived in his master's house--probably in the basement or the attic--but he still lived in the master's house.
So whenever that house Negro identified himself, he always identified himself in the same sense that his master identified himself. When his master said, "We have good food," the house Negro would say, "Yes, we have plenty of good food." "We" have plenty of good food. When the master said that "we have a fine home here," the house Negro said, "Yes, we have a fine home here." When the master would be sick, the house Negro identified himself so much with his master he'd say, "What's the matter boss, we sick?" His master's pain was his pain. And it hurt him more for his master to be sick than for him to be sick himself. When the house started burning down, that type of Negro would fight harder to put the master's house out than the master himself would.
But then you had another Negro out in the field. The house Negro was in the minority. The masses--the field Negroes were the masses. They were in the majority. When the master got sick, they prayed that he'd die. [Laughter] If his house caught on fire, they'd pray for a wind to come along and fan the breeze.
If someone came to the house Negro and said, "Let's go, let's separate," naturally that Uncle Tom would say, "Go where? What could I do without boss? Where would I live? How would I dress? Who would look out for me?" That's the house Negro. But if you went to the field Negro and said, "Let's go, let's separate," he wouldn't even ask you where or how. He'd say, "Yes, let's go." And that one ended right there."
http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/mmt/mxp/speeches/mxa17.html
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2598u1_malcolm
Fred.
من فکرمیکنم بااین نادانها حرف نزنی خیلی بهتره چون شخصیتت اسیب میبینه چون این بسیجیها ازخر هم خرترند
It takes a Damn traitor to know and certify that others are traitors too.
Obvioulsy this Kamal character and his gang of servants on this site, have a huge stake in the livelihood and survival of the mullas , otherwise they would not so vehemently be against a real change in iran.
All they can do is to adhere to some stupid and dumb mantra, that something that happened in iraq and afghanistan will happen in iran, and contninue to preach the "100 year long" approach which is really nothing but a load of crap and they know it too.